November 29, 2007  

Back to Home | Back to HS News



Originally published in the Health and Stress newsletter (July) of The American Institute of Stress
By Dr. Paul J. Rosch, M.D., President, The American Institute of Stress, Clinical Professor of Medicine and Psychiatry at the New York Medical College

Up until a few weeks ago, if you asked anyone, including doctors what they considered a normal or desirable adult blood pressure to be, 120/80 would have been the most frequent response. Not any more.

According to the new JNC-7 government guidelines,  120/80 puts you in a new disease category called "pre-hypertension" and at increased risk for heart attack, stroke, or kidney disease. The recommendations for rectifying this potentially deadly disorder are the usual advice to lose weight, avoid salt and sodium rich foods, exercise regularly, stop smoking and reduce stress. But even if you do achieve these goals, the results are not that rewarding, even for patients with blood pressures of 160/100 and higher.

People with pre-hypertension are even less likely to find that lifestyle modification will normalize their blood pressure, which means that medication will be required. Chalk another one up for the drug companies.

The first advice generally given to all patients with high blood pressure is to significantly restrict sodium intake. However, the vast majority fail to respond to this unless they have certain genetic traits. In some, calcium deficiency can be the culprit and they improve with calcium supplementation. These individuals may actually worsen on a low sodium regimen since this would sharply reduce the intake of dairy products that are the major source of dietary calcium. Others benefit from potassium and/or magnesium supplements. Jogging and running may help lower blood pressure for some people but more often has little effect and can even cause a rise. Hypertension is not a diagnosis like diabetes, but rather a description. It is simply an elevated blood pressure reading on some measuring device that can have many different causes. That helps to explain why we have some
drugs to treat high blood pressure. Unfortunately, there is no algorithm to guarantee which one will work best or be the safest for any specific patient.

Risk Factors And Other Fallacies

In order to successfully treat a disease it is necessary to remove or reduce its cause rather than its manifestations or markers. Treating a persistently elevated blood pressure is very different than treating an elevated blood sugar. While the goal in diabetes is to lower the blood sugar to normal, responses to medication and/or diet are much more predictable and sustained since the cause can almost always be identified. Giving non-specific drugs just to bring an elevated blood pressure down to normal could do more harm than good in certain situations especially for many older individuals with arteriosclerotic vessels, where a higher blood pressure is needed to maintain adequate blood flow to the kidneys and other vital organs. Whatever happened to the good old days when a normal systolic pressure was 100 plus your age? Not everyone agrees with this and the upper limit is now usually considered to be 140/90, even for people over 70. Indeed, some senior citizens consistently complain of weakness and dizziness if their blood pressures are lower than the 120/80 value that is now recommended. This is particularly true for women, who normally tend to have higher blood pressures than men in this age group. Much of this "one-size-fits-all" approach comes from confusion over what a "risk factor" really represents.

Most risk factors for heart disease are merely "risk markers" that simply have some statistical association with an increased incidence of coronary events. There are over 300 risk factors for heart attacks, including a deep earlobe crease, (shall we all have our ear lobes surgically removed?) premature vertex baldness, high selenium toenail levels, having a pot belly, not having a nap or one or two glasses of wine a day. Attempting to treat or remove such markers will accomplish nothing since they do not cause coronary disease. The same can be true for lowering an elevated systolic or diastolic blood pressure unless the treatment is directed at what is causing the problem, which is usually not clear.

No randomized clinical trials have ever proven that lowering an elevated systolic blood pressure to 140 reduces the risk for death due to coronary disease. A good example of this was the multicenter Multiple Risk Factor Trial (MRFIT) designed to demonstrate that reducing hypertension, high cholesterol and smoking would lower coronary mortality. After screening some 350,000 middle-aged men, close to 13,000 believed to be at greater jeopardy because of a preponderance of these putative risk factors were selected. They were divided into a treatment group to lower these markers and a control group that received usual care. After 10 years and $115 million, although the treatment group substantially achieved their objectives, they fared no different than controls who received usual care. In point of fact, a subset of hypertensives treated with diuretics had the highest mortality rates, probably from ventricular fibrillation due to potassium depletion.
The MRFIT objective was to get blood pressures below 140/90. One can only wonder what the mortality rate would have been if under 120/80 had been the goal.

Stress and Pseudo-hypertension

My personal experience has been that a significant percentage of patients being treated for "essential hypertension" can stop their medication without any adverse effects. When such individuals are admitted to the hospital for surgery or some unrelated condition and these drugs are discontinued deliberately or inadvertently, it is not unusual for blood pressures to fall to normal levels and remain there, only to rise again after discharge. Stress related or "white coat" hypertension is quite common. In one study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, more than one in four patients with elevated blood pressures in the doctor's office were found to have normal values on ambulatory monitoring. All were taken off drugs with no adverse effects.

Decades ago, when healthy young men being examined for insurance policies or entry into the armed services had high readings but no retinopathy, albuminuria or other indication of sustained hypertension, we used to reassure them and have them lie down and relax in a quiet room. After 15 or 20 minutes, repeated measurements were invariably much lower and usually normal. Busy doctors don't have time for that today. It's much easier and safer for them to prescribe a pill, since everyone knows that hypertension is the "silent killer". In addition, treating hypertension is easy, doesn't take much time or energy and is apt to be quite remunerative since periodic electrocardiograms and chest X-rays to monitor cardiac size and laboratory tests are readily justified. Only a few questions need to be asked, the patient often does not need to disrobe in an examining room and the entire encounter often takes less than ten minutes.

A not uncommon scenario is that when the patient returns after the initial diagnosis of hypertension has been made and a medication has been prescribed, he or she is even more nervous, blood pressure is still high or higher and the dose is increased. This may be repeated on subsequent visits and/or additional drugs are ordered. The result may be dizziness or other side effects that the patient now attributes to a worsening of hypertension, causing even more stress. It is also not generally appreciated that heart rate and blood pressure shoot up whenever we speak or try to communicate in some other way. The seminal investigations of this phenomenon showed that such elevation is greater if we are talking to someone of perceived higher social stature, more rapidly than usual, and if the content of the conversation deals with some important personal issue. Blood pressure rises in deaf mutes when they use sign language but not when they move their hands meaninglessly but with the same amount of energy.

We have also found that these rises are not blunted by any anti-hypertensive drugs and are actually exaggerated by beta blockers. It is not uncommon for anxious patients to talk immediately prior to or even while the doctor is inflating the cuff, which can increase blood pressure up to 50 percent in some people. Time of day, room temperature, a full bladder, eating, drinking or smoking within the past hour, and even the size of the cuff used by the blood pressure device can all influence measurements.


Let's recognize this 'pre-hypertension' initiative for the scam that it is. Considering the unscientific methodology leading to the diagnosis (and the many health-promoting non-pharmaceutical options available) condemning so-called  'pre-hypertensives' to a lifetime of health-destroying drug therapy can only be an obvious attempt by the drug industry to expand their market.


Information and statements have not been evaluated by the Food & Drug Administration. Products offered are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Dietary supplements are intended solely for nutritional support and individual results may vary.
 Home  :  Healthy Books  :  For A Healthy Heart  :  MedSearchHeart News Update  :  Contact Us

                                   Copyright 2002 All Rights Reserved.